ROS 1 vs ROS 2

The Fork in the Robot Operating System Road

For over a decade, ROS 1 (Robot Operating System 1) has served as the foundational middleware, propelling countless innovations in robotics research and early-stage deployments. It became the lingua franca for robotics engineers, a testament to its open-source nature and vibrant community.

However, as the demands on robotics systems have grown—from single-robot prototypes to large-scale commercial fleets, from laboratory settings to safety-critical industrial applications—the architectural limitations of ROS 1 became increasingly apparent. This led to the ambitious re-architecture: ROS 2.

This article aims to provide a clear, concise comparison of ROS 1 and ROS 2, dissecting their core differences, the motivations behind ROS 2's design, and what these distinctions mean for your robotics development, fleet management, and long-term strategy.

Understanding ROS 1: The Legacy Workhorse

ROS 1 emerged from the robotics research community as a flexible framework for writing robot software. At its core, it relies on a central component called the "ROS Master."

Key Characteristics of ROS 1:

• Centralized Architecture: The roscore (which includes the ROS Master, parameter server, and logging) acts as a single point of contact for all nodes, facilitating name resolution and communication.

  
  

• TCP/IP Communication: Data transfer between nodes primarily uses standard TCP/IP sockets, which is simple but can introduce latency and lack advanced quality-of-service (QoS) controls.

• Ease of Use for Research: Its straightforward design and extensive existing packages made it a favorite for rapid prototyping and academic research.

  
  

• Strong Community & Tooling: Boasted a massive collection of tutorials, packages (ros_comm, robot_state_publisher, etc.), and debugging tools like rqt_graph and rviz.

Limitations that Led to ROS 2: Despite its success, ROS 1's architecture wasn't designed for:

• Real-time Performance: Deterministic timing was difficult to guarantee.

• Security: Lacked built-in security features, a major concern for commercial deployments.

  
  

• Scalability: The ROS Master could become a bottleneck for large, distributed systems or multi-robot fleets.

• Robustness: A single point of failure (the ROS Master) meant system-wide disruption if it crashed.

  
  

• Non-Ethernet Communication: Challenging to implement over non-standard networks.

Why ROS 2? Addressing the Demands of Modern Robotics

ROS 2 was engineered from the ground up to overcome the fundamental limitations of ROS 1, targeting the needs of industrial robotics, commercial deployments, and safety-critical applications. It represents a significant leap forward in robotics software architecture.

Core Motivations for ROS 2:

1. Enterprise-Grade Reliability & Robustness: Eliminating the single point of failure and improving fault tolerance.

   
   

2. Enhanced Security: Built-in mechanisms for authentication, encryption, and access control.

3. Real-Time Capabilities: Designed to meet the stringent timing requirements of industrial control and critical robot behaviors.

4. Scalability for Distributed Systems: Supporting large numbers of robots and complex, decentralized applications without performance bottlenecks.

   
   

5. Multi-Platform Support: Better compatibility with diverse operating systems (Windows, macOS, RTOS, not just Linux).

   
   

6. Commercial Readiness: Features crucial for deployable, maintainable, and certifiable robotics products.

Key Architectural & Feature Differences: ROS 1 vs. ROS 2

Here's a breakdown of the most significant distinctions between the two versions:

Feature/Aspect	ROS 1	ROS 2	Impact for Robotics Teams
Communication Layer	ROS Master, TCP/IP, UDP (ros_comm)	DDS (Data Distribution Service), no master	Scalability, Reliability, Security. No single point of failure, better QoS, native security, multi-robot discovery.
Nodes & Processes	Independent executables	Component Nodes, Executors, Lifecycle Management	Performance, Robustness. Run multiple nodes in one process (composability), predictable startup/shutdown, better error handling.
Launch System	roslaunch (XML-based)	ros2 launch (Python-based)	Flexibility, Programmability. More powerful, programmatic control over startup configurations.
Parameters	rosparam (dynamic, type-inferred)	ROS 2 Parameter Server (type-safe, dynamic)	Stability, Maintainability. Type-checked parameters, safer dynamic configuration updates.
Security	Not built-in	DDS Security (native), SROS 2	Critical for Commercial Deployments. Authentication, encryption, access control by default.
Real-time Support	Best-effort	Hard real-time potential (with RTOS)	Precision & Predictability. Enables industrial control, faster reaction times.
Build System	Catkin	Colcon	Efficiency. More flexible, parallel building for complex workspaces.
Tools	rostopic, rosnode, rviz, rqt	ros2 topic, ros2 node, rviz2, rqt_py_common	Modernized Experience. Similar functionality with performance/feature improvements.
Language Support	C++, Python (primary)	C++, Python, Java, C#, RTPS, etc.	Wider Developer Pool. More options for integration into diverse software environments.
Platform Support	Linux (primary)	Linux, Windows, macOS, RTOS	Flexibility. Deploy on more diverse computing platforms.

Developer Experience and the Evolving Ecosystem

The shift to ROS 2 does present an initial learning curve for developers accustomed to ROS 1's patterns. Concepts like DDS Quality of Service (QoS) policies, node lifecycle management, and the new ros2 launch system require a deeper understanding. However, this investment quickly pays off.

The ROS 2 ecosystem is rapidly maturing:

• Nav2 (Navigation 2): A completely re-architected and highly configurable navigation stack built specifically for ROS 2, offering superior performance and flexibility.

  
  

• Growing Package Support: New perception packages, manipulation libraries, and simulation tools are increasingly being developed for or ported to ROS 2.

  
  

• Improved Introspection & Debugging: Tools in ROS 2 offer more granular control and deeper insights into system behavior.

ROS 1 is no longer receiving security updates, and new development is almost exclusively happening in ROS 2. This means that staying on ROS 1 increasingly puts your team at a disadvantage, limiting access to new features, community support, and critical security patches.

When to Use Which? Strategic Considerations

Choosing between ROS 1 and ROS 2 for your robotics project depends heavily on your specific goals and existing infrastructure:

• When ROS 1 might still be considered (with caution):

  • Deep Legacy Systems: For existing, deployed ROS 1 fleets with massive, battle-tested codebases where immediate, full migration is not feasible. Even then, a ROS 2 migration strategy should be on the roadmap.

  • Highly Specialized Hardware: If your hardware relies exclusively on ROS 1 drivers with no ROS 2 alternatives, a phased approach using ROS 1-ROS 2 bridges might be necessary.

• When ROS 2 is the clear choice (The Present & Future):

  • New Robotics Projects: For any new robotics development, starting with ROS 2 is the unequivocal recommendation.

  • Commercial & Industrial Deployments: If your robot needs security, real-time performance, robustness, or certification, ROS 2 is essential.

  • Scalable Robot Fleets: For multi-robot systems or large-scale deployments, ROS 2's distributed architecture offers superior performance and reliability.

  • Leveraging Latest Features: To utilize Nav2, new AI/ML integrations, or other cutting-edge robotics software.

  • Long-Term Support & Maintainability: To ensure your robotics solution remains current, secure, and supported by the community.

The Migration Imperative: Don't Get Left Behind

With ROS 1 Noetic reaching its End-of-Life (EOL) in May 2025, the question for robotics teams is no longer if to migrate, but when and how to do so effectively. Procrastination introduces mounting technical debt, security vulnerabilities, and a growing gap in your team's ability to innovate.

Understanding the fundamental architectural shifts and the compelling advantages of ROS 2 is the first step towards a successful transition. This knowledge empowers you to build more robust, scalable, and secure robotics solutions ready for the demands of the real world.

---

Empower Your ROS 2 Journey with Eight Vectors

Navigating the complexities of ROS 1 to ROS 2 migration can be challenging, but you don't have to do it alone. At Eight Vectors, we specialize in empowering robotics teams through expert ROS 2 consulting, customized training programs, and the development of advanced fleet management and observability solutions.

Whether you need a strategic migration roadmap, hands-on ROS 2 training for your engineers, or tailored software development to leverage ROS 2's full potential, Eight Vectors is your partner in future-proofing your robotics fleet.

Contact Eight Vectors for a strategic consultation today!

---